Intelligence Information Report (IIR) — NATO/OSINT Adapted Format

====================================================================
INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION REPORT (IIR)
====================================================================

--- HEADER ---
REPORT NUMBER:        [ORG]-IIR-[YYYY]-[NNNN]
CLASSIFICATION:       UNCLASSIFIED // FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SUBJECT COUNTRY:      [Country ISO 3166-1 alpha-3]
PREPARED BY:          [Analyst name or team]
REPORT DATE:          [ISO 8601: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mmZ]
PERIOD OF REPORT:     [Start date → End date]
REQUESTING OFFICE:    [Team/Department that requested the analysis]

--- SOURCE EVALUATION (NATO A-F / 1-6 system) ---
SOURCE RELIABILITY:   [A/B/C/D/E/F]
  A=Confirmed · B=Usually reliable · C=Fairly reliable
  D=Not usually reliable · E=Unreliable · F=Cannot be judged
INFO CREDIBILITY:     [1/2/3/4/5/6]
  1=Confirmed by others · 2=Probably true
  3=Possibly true · 4=Doubtfully true · 5=Improbable
  6=Cannot be judged
SOURCE DESCRIPTION:   [One line, do not expose sensitive source]
SOURCE ACCESS:        [Public / Aggregated / Paid / Provided by third party]

--- CONFIDENCE LEVEL (ICD 203) ---
CONFIDENCE:           [HIGH / MODERATE / LOW]
JUSTIFICATION:        [2-3 lines. High = corroborated by ≥2 independent sources
                       with solid causal logic. Moderate = 1 reliable or 2 moderate.
                       Low = single or weak source]
KEY ASSUMPTIONS:      [List of assumptions that, if broken, lower confidence]

--- BODY ---
BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front):
   [1-3 sentences. The reader must understand the critical finding from this alone.]

KEY FINDINGS (numbered, max 5):
   1. [Critical finding #1]
   2. [Critical finding #2]
   3. [Critical finding #3]

EVIDENCE (each finding with support):
   - Finding #1:
       * Sources: [URL + capture date]
       * Capture: [SHA-256 of original document / screenshot]
       * Archive: [archive.org snapshot URL if applicable]

ANALYSIS (interpretation, not evidence):
   [What it means, what it implies, what it does not imply. Apply SATs from Appendix B]

KNOWLEDGE GAPS (what you DO NOT know):
   - [Gap 1]
   - [Gap 2]

RECOMMENDATIONS (prioritized next steps):
   1. [Action — who, what, when]
   2. [Action]
   3. [Action]

--- ANNEXES ---
A. Sources list (URLs, dates, hashes)
B. Charts/maps/graphs (ownership diagram, timeline, geo)
C. Raw data (PDFs, screenshots, exports)
D. Methodology note (which SATs were applied)
E. Chain of Custody log (see 45.5)

--- DISTRIBUTION ---
TO:    [Nominal list]
CC:    [Nominal list]
NOFORN: [Y/N]

--- REVISION HISTORY ---
| Rev | Date       | Author              | Changes                       |
|-----|------------|---------------------|-------------------------------|
| 0.1 | 2026-07-19 | A. Senior           | Initial draft                 |
| 1.0 | 2026-07-20 | A. Senior+Reviewer  | Peer review, approval         |
====================================================================

🔒 Drafts are saved only in this browser.